gamblingman wrote:you are correct....anything "re-manufactured" should not be allowed under the law, but the problems are in the details....and most folks just don't want to deal with it.
Who is going to be the expert in metalurgy that is going to testify the machine was not made in the 1930's......you and I might be able to tell the difference, or at least think we can tell the difference, but are you really going to state your reputation on a gear pulled from a MIlls clock? and could I hold up two and you bet everything on knowing which is original and which is repro?
Also, when most states enacted their laws, they wanted to cover all angles, so they placed in wording such as "any such machine, or any part of such machine".....which would lend you to believe that just having one piece of an illegal slot machine in your pocket was an arrestable offense. But that same wording can be used against the state as the manufacturers can say that just having one old piece makes a "whole", then just having an old piece on a machine makes it antique. I know a lot of these guys were using an old spring or two and calling these things "re-manufactured". Where do you set the percentage? 50% repro, 70% ??? Can you guarantee everything in your collection is original enough and that you have never used a repro part? What about wood? If you replace the base and sides, what percentage of the machine is that? and does that make it now "re-manufactured"? It is common to replace the wood on restorations......whay is that acceptable and castings are not? And you can't say it is because wood rots.....so does aluminum and steel, just at different rates. What percentage is the mech vs the case? Any definations you comne up with need to cover every machine and possible combination out there. There are a whole list of arguments I can make........ Believe me, I am NOT saying they should be allowed to reproduce these things at will, but who is going to spend the time dealing with it?
And then you have the whole question of intent. Mechanical slots are not more of a novelty item......so is any jury going to see the harm in a business making "novelty slot machines" so long as they are represented as something other than original? If they are produced in mass and shipped to a hidden casino somewhere....maybe. But for uncle George to go and buy one because he always wanted a slot in his den, is not the crime of the century. I hate the repros, and I hate what they do to the industry. It is just a matter of time before we start seeing these machines being taken apart as they get older, and all of the parts sold as "original finds" on the web. Who is going to know the difference? Not many......
I hear what you are saying but I am still surprised that some anti gambling law enforcement zealot never busted RB for making brand new slot machines. It would not have been difficult to do a raid and basically see an assembly line putting the brand new machines together. I remember seeing an article in Loose Change showing the RB fake Rol-A-Tops. They showed a table with a line of the fakes. Fortunately, in the case of the Rol-A-Top, RB did a horrible job on them and they are butt ugly and easy to spot. No escalator and I think they have a Pace mechanism. In this case, RB, was basically making a brand new machine. Kind of like what Rock-Ola did with the revamps.
If they would have got their records I am sure they could have found the foundry that was making the castings and parts for them.
As far as the argument of using original parts. Let's say an original antique has 500 parts (counting screws, springs, nuts, etc.). They could theoretically take the parts on just one antique and use those parts to pump out 500 "remanufactured" machines by using just one part in each "remanufactured" machine.